<p dir="ltr">Software engineering (SE) relies on various tools and best practices to support the creation and maintenance of complex software systems. However, recent research has shown that many SE tools and practices are not equally effective for all ways of thinking. Despite this, few have been examined through the lens of cognitive style. This study investigates how individuals with different cognitive styles interact with SE tools and practices through empirical research. We aim to analyse the cognitive processes involved in SE and identify potential “inclusivity bugs” that disadvantage certain thinking styles. Our initial study on debuggers revealed 21 such inclusivity bugs. Building on this, we will conceptualize and validate more cognitively inclusive designs through further studies. This research highlights the critical role of cognitive inclusivity in fostering equitable and efficient tools and practices, particularly as they continue to evolve and shape the field.</p>